Abstract
- Each the iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge are anticipated to compromise on battery life in change for thinness.
- That is a step backwards, contemplating that nobody is asking for thinner telephones, but individuals are at all times asking for extra runtime.
- It could be that the telephones are a mandatory step in the direction of a greater future, however as rumored, they will not be getting my cash.
It looks like
iPhone 17
rumors are hitting continuous lately, which is smart — we’re about 4 months out from launch, so {hardware} particulars must be locked down forward of mass manufacturing. It takes fairly some time to churn out the tens of millions of items Apple must fulfill worldwide launch demand.
The newest rumor (by way of The Information), is that so as to obtain its ultra-thin 5.5mm physique, the
iPhone 17 Air
will sport a critical compromise in battery life. How a lot? Allegedly, Apple’s inner testing means that simply 60 to 70% of householders will be capable of make it a full day on a single cost, down from about 80 to 90% for different iPhone fashions. The corporate is even mentioned to be getting ready a brand new battery case, one thing it hasn’t supplied because the discontinued MagSafe Battery Pack.
Comparable rumors have emerged round Samsung’s
Galaxy S25 Edge
. In accordance with WinFuture, the telephone might have a 3,900mAh battery — that is extra capability than the iPhone 16, however under the common S25’s 4,000mAh, and far lower than the S25 Extremely’s 5,000mAh. That is put me off each Samsung and Apple’s upcoming “vanguard” telephones, and never simply because everybody prefers larger numbers.
Associated
Is the iPhone 15 still worth buying in 2025? The answer is complicated
Presumably, however you should not get one straight from Apple.
Dealing with the established order
As a tech journalist, I is perhaps an exception, however I discover that almost all telephones nonetheless haven’t got sufficient battery life, by no means thoughts rolling issues again. My present day by day driver is an iPhone 16 Professional, which in line with Apple, needs to be able to as much as 22 hours of (streaming) video playback. Sounds spectacular, proper? In follow, nevertheless, I am struggling to consider how that could possibly be potential. I prefer to placed on Reuters’ video briefing whereas I bathe and alter within the morning, and I am going to typically see the battery drop to 90% or decrease earlier than I even get downstairs for breakfast. On exercise days, it is potential for the battery to dip under 30% by the point I get into mattress, and that is after a 15- to 16-hour day of principally non-video exercise. If I really spent an hour or two streaming YouTube, I might in all probability must put my telephone in Low Energy Mode sooner or later.
This 12 months, it looks like each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake.
I might say it is baffling that Apple and Samsung look like headed within the improper route, however actually, it isn’t. Each corporations have lengthy put different upgrades forward of battery life. It’s, in idea, potential to make it over a day for those who’ve acquired a telephone just like the Galaxy S25 Extremely or iPhone 16 Professional Max, however solely with gentle utilization. Certainly, battery life has at all times performed second fiddle for many smartphone makers, just because larger batteries are costly whereas being robust to use in advertising campaigns. A 6.9-inch display or a 10X telephoto lens is instantly spectacular — it is more durable to wow individuals with an additional two or three hours of runtime.
This 12 months, it looks like each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake. It should appeal to some individuals, actually, however we’re not within the 2000s anymore — telephones have been skinny for a very long time. Nobody I do know is complaining about thickness. If something, the problem appears to be that telephones have grow to be unwieldly, getting thinner whereas concurrently rising taller, wider, and slipperier. Metallic and glass could also be good aesthetically — however with no case, skinny units like my iPhone and my spouse’s OnePlus 9 5G really feel like they may slip out of my palms with one improper gesture.

Associated
The OnePlus 13R shows OnePlus still needs to figure out budget phones
So near finances nirvana, but to this point.
A worrisome route for the long run
Misusing the most recent tech
Each the iPhone 17 Air and S25 Edge could also be based mostly on silicon-carbon batteries, a variation of the lithium-ion batteries we’re used to, merely with larger power density. That hasn’t been confirmed, however the tech has been utilized in just a few telephones already, and now appears poised to go mainstream.
In that case, I am frightened {that a} dangerous precedent is rising. Once I first heard about silicon-carbon, my hope was that we might get extra longevity out of telephones the identical measurement, or no less than equal longevity from barely smaller units. Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we could possibly be hit with a wave of copycat units, a few of which can additionally throw battery life beneath the bus. That may take the trade backward at a time when individuals are extra depending on smartphones than ever.
To be truthful, Apple and Samsung could also be making an attempt to maintain components prices down and retail costs in test. Silicon-carbon batteries are costlier to provide for the time being, so even making an attempt to match the capacities of ordinary lithium-ion batteries could also be tough with no chew into revenue margins. It could possibly be that after manufacturing prices come down, we’ll see capacities go up once more, fulfilling the brand new tech’s promise. Who is aware of — perhaps Apple will really ship a two-day iPhone sooner or later.
Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we’ll inevitably be hit with a wave of copycat units, a few of which can additionally throw battery life beneath the bus.
Alongside these traces, I am hopeful that each the Air and the Edge will serve a function just like the iPhone X, which Apple launched in 2017. This was the primary iPhone with an OLED show and a
Face ID
digicam, costing a then-unprecedented $999. Many individuals balked at it, however gross sales of the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone 11 Professional finally pushed manufacturing prices down, making it potential to place each OLED and Face ID on the $799 iPhone 12. Nowadays, even the $599
iPhone 16e
shares these options.
Time will inform how briskly the brand new battery tech bridges over to helpful capacities at reasonably priced costs, if it does in any respect. I simply know that for now, Apple and Samsung can rely me out of units that cut back battery life with none tangible advantages. It will hardly matter how cool a telephone seems to be sliding out of my pocket if I can not make it to the health club and again with out plugging into my automobile — or from Alberta to Texas with no battery pack or charging through the flight’s layover. I assume I am going to nonetheless be bringing my iPad alongside for mid-flight leisure.

You may also like
Everything you need to know about PEVs, or personal electric vehicles
You should utilize PEVs to discover, run errands, or velocity up your commute.
Trending Merchandise

NETGEAR Nighthawk Tri-Band WiFi 6E Router (RA...

Acer Nitro KG241Y Sbiip 23.8â Full HD (1...

Acer KB272 EBI 27″ IPS Full HD (1920 x ...
